(DRAFT) Minutes
Moorings Cluster Association
Annual and Special Meeting
Reston Community Center, Lake Anne
24 October 2002
Present: Carolyn Badila, Bill Berkson, Tim and Alex Cohn, Karen Compton, Jack E. Corkey, Bob Eurich, Sigrid and Bill Jackman, Mr. and Mrs. Julian-Aminoff, Art Lambert, Erik Landberg, Pat and Allen Lenz, Carol Matthews, Andrew Nachison, Robyn Spence, Karen and Gaylon Swanson, Ron Taylor, Amy Thompson, Stan Wellington.
Noting the presence of a quorum, the President called the meeting to order at 8:03 p.m.
Approval of 18 March 2002 MinutesMotion to accept 18 March 2002 minutes as corrected. Seconded. Passed unanimously.
President's Report (Bill Berkson)
Two major items were discussed:
1) Streetlights: The street lights on WEL were out for most of summer, but
they are now -finally- working.
Q: Are we going to get credit from Dominion Electric for time with light
out?
A: The Board will look into it.
There continue to be problems with the
streetlights on Moorings. The new Board will try to address this problem.
2) New Cluster Entrance Sign: The new sign is in place at the Cluster entrance.
Treasurer's Report (Tim, on behalf of Frank)
Frank Best, Cluster Treasurer, not being present, the Cluster's financial condition was reported by Tim Cohn. Briefly, the Cluster is in good financial shape [see attached budget document].
Q: Are we "robbing reserves" to fund current expenses?
A: No. Along
these lines we are also about to do a study to determine Cluster Reserve needs.
Q: Why is there $216 listed under "light bulbs and other"?
A: This
includes a payment to Galaxy Electric for repairs to one of the light poles
on Moorings.
Secretary's Report (Tim)
Thanks to Alex Cohn, Moorings Cluster webmaster, we have an updated and much-improved Cluster website www.mooringsclusterassociation.org
Grounds Committee (Erik)
[See attached recommendations from last meeting (attached)].
A brief introduction on the role of the Grounds Committee was presented, and it was noted that the Cluster grounds are currently in good shape thanks to donations of various kinds and a lot of volunteer work from Pat Lenz and many others. The drought made it a tough year for the plants; much watering was required during the summer.
Q: Are dogs "using" Cluster property as before?
A: No. The new landscaping
and garden seem to have encouraged pet owners to take their dogs elsewhere.
Two new projects that Grounds Committee expects to take on:
Art Lambert reported that the Cluster hired an arborist to remove dead branches over parking areas. We need to look at this as an annual event (and expense) because we now have many overhanging trees.
Also, Cluster residents are advised to please report any dead or dying trees to Art so that we can have the arborist deal with them.
Q: We need a plan so that we don't over-plant -there isn't room for too
many trees.
A: Agreed.
Q: If we have a problem, who should we contact.
A: Please notify
Art Lambert.
Q: Were borers in the dogwoods taken care of? How bad is the situation?
A: Arborist didn't think much could be done to save the trees.
Q: What is the condition of the cherry tree that got knocked over and replanted?
A:
Seems to be OK. (It was noted that if a tree doesn't survive, we should not
automatically replace it).
Sign and Signage Committee (Bill Berkson)
Q: Could we paint the curb in front of the sign at entrance to Cluster?
A:
Officially, we don't have jurisdiction over that spot. Bill will ask Fire Marshall
if it would be OK to paint spot.
Q: Does declaration of "Backyard Habitat"affect home backyards?
A:
No. The designation applies only to the Cluster property.
Q: Will the signs be readable?
A: Yes.
Q: Does cost include removal of existing signs
A: Yes [$200 had been
added to cover removal costs].
A motion was made to approve $2500 from reserves to pay for signs. This was seconded, and then a motion was made to amend the original motion to include acceptance of the design of the signs as proposed by the Sign Committee. Amendment seconded and approved unanimously. Original motion passed unanimously as amended.
Elections (Bill Berkson)
The President explained that there had been a mixup some years back that has somehow persisted until this year. In short, odd numbered blocks should be elected this year, but they were elected last year when even numbered blocks should have been. To "regularize" this, the Board suggested that it would be appropriate to hold elections this year for the even-number blocks as well as odd-numbered blocks. The plan is to re-elect the even and odd-numbered blocks this year, with the exception of block 6 (which was, according to the minutes, elected last year).
After some discussion about procedure, the President invited open nominations for the block representative positions:
| Block 1: | Erik Landberg nominated. Seconded. (No other nominations) |
| Block 2: | Andrew Nachison nominated. Seconded. (No other nominations) |
| Block 3: | Pat Lenz nominated. Seconded. (No other nominations) |
| Block 4: | Carol Matthews nominated. Seconded. and |
| Block 5: | Frank Best nominated. Seconded. (No other nominations) |
| Block 7: | Tim Cohn nominated. Seconded (No other nominations) |
The unopposed candidates, Erik Landberg, Andrew Nachison, Pat Lenz, Frank Best, and Tim Cohn, were elected unanimously. There followed some discussion related to the candidates for Block 4 representative. Following the discussion, there was a recorded vote. 13 households voted for Carol Matthews; 2 households voted for David Lu. Carol Matthews was declared representative for Block 4.
Note that even-numbered blocks will be up for election in 2003.
New Business:
1) House Numbers: The Sign and Signage Committee decided not to act on the issue of House numbers. However, the Board did discuss a number of possible options: One proposal was to create Cluster "guidelines" that would recommend location, size, shape, font, and color of numbers. Another proposal was to do nothing. A third possibility is that the Cluster could hire a contractor to install uniform numbers at Cluster expense.
Bill demonstrated metal numbers ($14/letter) and plastic ones ($5/letter). Installation would be costly (possibly $15/letter).
We would like a common solution for the Cluster, but $4500 is a lot of money. Also, are 3 inch tall numbers big enough to be easily read?
Many diverse opinions were expressed on this issue. Some residents favor regimented house numbers; others value individual expression. Bill Berkson reviewed the history of the Sign issues in Cluster, and how issue of House Numbers came up.
One concern related to ambulances, fire engines, etc, being unable to find a house in an emergency.
It was suggested that we could we make a Cluster recommendation that would facilitate, but not mandate, consistency in house numbers.
[It was noted that if people are repairing their garages, at the same time they should try to level the skirt above their garage.]
Motion: The Board will adopt the design for letters as a guideline for house numbers. The guideline is to be put on the website, compliance will be voluntary, and no Cluster funds are to be spent on this. Amendment: 4" letters instead of 3". [4" Avante-Garde Numbers]. Seconded. Passed. Original motion passed 14 to 3.
2) Database of Contractors
Q: Can we create a database of service people (plumbers, electricians,
etc.).
A: Reston Association has such a site. We will put a link on the
MCA page. The Cluster webmaster should be consulted if something more than this
is needed.
3) Sharing Contractors
Q: Groups could get together to hire professional inspectors to inspect
whole house, find termites, exterminate them. This would save money.
A:
This question about finding common solutions to our common problems was also
raised in a letter from a Cluster resident who could not attend the meeting.
We could certainly get together to paint, exterminate, etc. But it requires
someone to organize the effort.
4) Parking Bays
Concern was expressed about condition of the parking area railroad ties (1600-1610).
Gaylon Swanson offered thanks to everyone who helped get the lights working.
Meeting adjourned at 9:50 p.m.
--Minutes submitted by Tim Cohn, 26 October 2002